Linguistics for language learning and research



anthropolinguistics, macrolinguistics, microlinguistics, morphological, neurolinguistics, phonological, psycholinguistics, semantic structures, sociolinguistics, syntactic


Linguistics is a science that makes language the object of its study. Linguistics itself is divided into two scopes of learning including, microlinguistics and macrolinguistics. Where each scope has a different purpose, microlinguistics studies only limited to the internal structure of language without applying the knowledge in social life, while macro linguistics studies language in relation to the outside world and the application of the language in social life. Linguistics as a science of language can also be the basis for conducting research, where the object of study is the language itself. In conducting research, researchers can use qualitative or quantitative research methods depending on what problem will be the object of research.


Aragão, R. (2011). Beliefs and emotions in foreign language learning. System, 39(3), 302-313. DOI:

Benson, P., & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27(4), 459-472. DOI:

Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 348-363. DOI:

Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: what do learners believe about them?. System, 27(4), 493-513. DOI:

De Koninck, J., Lorrain, D., Christ, G., Proulx, G., & Coulombe, D. (1989). Intensive language learning and increases in rapid eye movement sleep: evidence of a performance factor. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 8(1), 43-47. DOI:

Desmond, J. E., & Fiez, J. A. (1998). Neuroimaging studies of the cerebellum: language, learning and memory. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2(9), 355-362. DOI:

Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31(3), 313-330. DOI:

Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209-224. DOI:

Evseeva, A., & Solozhenko, A. (2015). Use of flipped classroom technology in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 205-209. DOI:

Gerken, L. (2006). Decisions, decisions: Infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible. Cognition, 98(3), B67-B74. DOI:

Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (2000). Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(5), 178-186. DOI:

Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), 367-383. DOI:

Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34(3), 399-415. DOI:

Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners' beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27(4), 557-576. DOI:

Klein, D., Mok, K., Chen, J. K., & Watkins, K. E. (2014). Age of language learning shapes brain structure: a cortical thickness study of bilingual and monolingual individuals. Brain and language, 131, 20-24. DOI:

Li, P., Legault, J., & Litcofsky, K. A. (2014). Neuroplasticity as a function of second language learning: anatomical changes in the human brain. Cortex, 58, 301-324. DOI:

Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35(3), 338-352. DOI:

Mårtensson, J., Eriksson, J., Bodammer, N. C., Lindgren, M., Johansson, M., Nyberg, L., & Lövdén, M. (2012). Growth of language-related brain areas after foreign language learning. NeuroImage, 63(1), 240-244. DOI:

Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and education, 20(1), 10-21. DOI:

Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive science, 14(1), 11-28. DOI:

Niyogi, P., & Berwick, R. C. (1996). A language learning model for finite parameter spaces. Cognition, 61(1-2), 161-193. DOI:

Oroujlou, N., & Vahedi, M. (2011). Motivation, attitude, and language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 994-1000. DOI:

Peacock, M. (2001). Pre-service ESL teachers' beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29(2), 177-195. DOI:

Pinker, S. (1979). Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 7(3), 217-283. DOI:

Sakui, K., & Gaies, S. J. (1999). Investigating Japanese learners' beliefs about language learning. System, 27(4), 473-492. DOI:

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yang, J. M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 16, 68-84. DOI:

Tsou, W., Wang, W., & Tzeng, Y. (2006). Applying a multimedia storytelling website in foreign language learning. Computers & Education, 47(1), 17-28. DOI:

Turgut, Y., & İrgin, P. (2009). Young learners’ language learning via computer games. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 760-764. DOI:

Van Lier, L. (2010). The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory, theory to practice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 2-6. DOI:

Witt, S. M., & Young, S. J. (2000). Phone-level pronunciation scoring and assessment for interactive language learning. Speech communication, 30(2-3), 95-108. DOI:



How to Cite

Amori, H. (2021). Linguistics for language learning and research. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 2(2), 37–45.