History and field linguistics



behavioral units, fiction, language research, language since, linguistic society, linguistics, semantics, structural grammar, structural linguistics, traditional grammar


This study aims to understand the history and fields of science in linguistics. Until the Renaissance, the languages studied were Greek and Latin. Latin had an important role at that time because it was used as a tool in the world of education, administration, and international diplomacy in Western Europe. During the Renaissance, language research began to develop into Romance languages (French, Spanish, and Italian) which were considered to have Latin roots, as well as non-Roman languages such as English, German, Dutch, Swedish, and Danish.


Aarts, B. (2004). Conceptions of gradience in the history of linguistics. Language Sciences, 26(4), 343-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2003.07.001

Achugar, M., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2005). Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks. Linguistics and Education, 16(3), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.02.003

Ariani, M. G., Sajedi, F., & Sajedi, M. (2014). Forensic linguistics: A brief overview of the key elements. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 222-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.078

Belhassen, Y., & Caton, K. (2009). Advancing understandings: A linguistic approach to tourism epistemology. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(2), 335-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.01.006

Brandist, C. (2008). Sociological linguistics in Leningrad: The institute for the comparative history of the literatures and languages of the west and east (ILJaZV) 1921–1933. Russian Literature, 63(2-4), 171-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruslit.2008.04.003

Brown, K. (2005). Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 1). Elsevier.

Collinge, N. E. (1995). History of comparative linguistics. In Concise History of the Language Sciences (pp. 195-202). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042580-1.50037-4

Collinge, N. E. (1995). History of historical linguistics. In Concise History of the Language Sciences (pp. 203-212). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042580-1.50038-6

Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for specific purposes, 23(4), 397-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001

De Vries, A., & De Vries, A. (2004). Elsevier's dictionary of symbols and imagery. Brill.

do Couto, H. H. (2014). Ecological approaches in linguistics: a historical overview. Language Sciences, 41, 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.001

Eling, P., & Whitaker, H. (2009). History of aphasia: from brain to language. In Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 95, pp. 571-582). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0072-9752(08)02136-2

Figueroa, E. (2014). Sociolinguistic metatheory. Elsevier.

Gal, S. (2006). Linguistic anthropology. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 7, 171-185.

Gnutzmann, C., & Rabe, F. (2014). ‘Theoretical subtleties’ or ‘text modules’? German researchers' language demands and attitudes across disciplinary cultures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13, 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.10.003

Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of second language writing, 11(4), 329-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00091-7

Kaplan, R. B., & Grabe, W. (2002). A modern history of written discourse analysis. Journal of second language writing, 11(3), 191-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00085-1

Koerner, E. F. (1995). History of linguistics: the field. Concise History of the Language Sciences, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042580-1.50004-0

Koerner, E. F. K. (1995). Historiography of linguistics. In Concise History of the Language Sciences (pp. 7-16). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042580-1.50005-2

Koerner, E. F. K., & Asher, R. E. (Eds.). (2014). Concise history of the language sciences: from the Sumerians to the cognitivists. Elsevier.

Koerner, K. (1997). Linguistics vs Philology: Self-definition of a field or rhetorical stance?. Language Sciences, 19(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00057-5

Korta, K. (2008). Malinowski and pragmatics: Claim making in the history of linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(10), 1645-1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.006

Kress, G. (1989). History and language: Towards a social account of linguistic change. Journal of pragmatics, 13(3), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(89)90065-9

Lehmann, W. P., & Malkiel, Y. (Eds.). (2017). Directions for historical linguistics. Brill.

Martin, J. R. (2013). Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.006

Matsuda, P. K., Canagarajah, A. S., Harklau, L., Hyland, K., & Warschauer, M. (2003). Changing currents in second language writing research: A colloquium. Journal of second language writing, 12(2), 151-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00016-X

Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(3), 141-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9

Nerlich, B., & Clarke, D. D. (2000). Semantic fields and frames: Historical explorations of the interface between language, action, and cognition. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(2), 125-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00042-9

Newmeyer, F. J. (2014). Linguistic theory in America. Elsevier.

Priva, U. C., & Austerweil, J. L. (2015). Analyzing the history of cognition using topic models. Cognition, 135, 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.006

Vongpumivitch, V., Huang, J. Y., & Chang, Y. C. (2009). Frequency analysis of the words in the Academic Word List (AWL) and non-AWL content words in applied linguistics research papers. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.08.003



How to Cite

Zun, X. Z. (2020). History and field linguistics. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 1(2), 93–103. Retrieved from https://mami.nyc/index.php/journal/article/view/9