Syntactic structure, morphology, free morphemes and bound morphemes


  • Simberley Vressick-Chilborn University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • Mohammad Ozinan Rachman London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom


syntactic structure, morphology, free morphemes, bound morphemes, English, root, words form


This study aims to explain the meaning of syntax, syntactic structure in English. The root is a term to refer to a word form that cannot be further divided, cannot be analyzed again, there is no additional affix. This root is always there, although in the form of various modifications of a lexeme. For example; walk, which is a root, can appear in the form of words, such as walks, walking, walked. Drink, is a root, can appear in the form of words, such as drinks, drinking, drunk.


Bhatnagar, S., & Whitaker, H. A. (1984). Agrammatism on inflectional bound morphemes: A case study of a Hindi-speaking aphasic patient. Cortex, 20(2), 295-301.

Cinque, G. (2002). Mapping functional structure: a project. Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, 1, 3-11.

Compton, R., & Pittman, C. (2010). Word-formation by phase in Inuit. Lingua, 120(9), 2167-2192.

Friedmann, N. A., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1997). Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and language, 56(3), 397-425.

Fu, G., Kit, C., & Webster, J. J. (2008). Chinese word segmentation as morpheme-based lexical chunking. Information Sciences, 178(9), 2282-2296.

Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 133-177). Academic Press.

Haarmann, H. J., & Kolk, H. H. (1992). The production of grammatical morphology in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics: Speed and accuracy factors. Cortex, 28(1), 97-112.

Harley, H. (2013). External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua, 125, 34-57.

Haryu, E., & Kajikawa, S. (2016). Use of bound morphemes (noun particles) in word segmentation by Japanese-learning infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 18-27.

Hoosain, R. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 90, pp. 111-130). North-Holland.

Hustad, K. C. (2006). A closer look at transcription intelligibility for speakers with dysarthria: Evaluation of scoring paradigms and linguistic errors made by listeners.

Huysmans, E., De Jong, J., van Lanschot-Wery, J. H., Festen, J. M., & Goverts, S. T. (2014). Long-term effects of congenital hearing impairment on language performance in adults. Lingua, 139, 102-121.

Kean, M. L. (1977). The linguistic interpretation of aphasic syndromes: Agrammatism in Broca's aphasia, an example. Cognition, 5(1), 9-46.

Lukatela, K., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1988). Sensitivity to inflectional morphology in agrammatism: Investigation of a highly inflected language. Brain and Language, 33(1), 1-15.

Marini, A., Tavano, A., & Fabbro, F. (2008). Assessment of linguistic abilities in Italian children with specific language impairment. Neuropsychologia, 46(11), 2816-2823.

Marquis, A., & Shi, R. (2012). Initial morphological learning in preverbal infants. Cognition, 122(1), 61-66.

Mayberry, R. I., & Eichen, E. B. (1991). The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of memory and language, 30(4), 486-512.

Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Variation in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so-called agrammatic patients. Brain and language, 36(3), 447-492.

Mitchell, E. (2006). The morpho-syntax of negation and the positions of NegP in the Finno-Ugric languages. Lingua, 116(3), 228-244.

Nilipour, R. (1989). Task-specific agrammatism in a Farsi-English bilingual patient. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 4(2), 243-253.

Oz, H. (2014). Morphological awareness and some implications for English language teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 98-103.

Rochon, E., Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2000). Quantitative analysis of aphasic sentence production: Further development and new data. Brain and language, 72(3), 193-218.

Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(9), 353-361.

Stemberger, J. P. (1985). Bound morpheme loss errors in normal and agrammatic speech: one mechanism or two?. Brain and Language, 25(2), 246-256.

Taft, M., & Kougious, P. (2004). The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words. Brain and Language, 90(1-3), 9-16.

Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. Morphological aspects of language processing, 293-316.

Thompson, C. K., Fix, S., & Gitelman, D. (2002). Selective impairment of morphosyntactic production in a neurological patient. Journal of neurolinguistics, 15(3-5), 189-207.

van Hoogmoed, A. H., Knoors, H., Schreuder, R., & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Complex word reading in Dutch deaf children and adults. Research in developmental disabilities, 34(3), 1083-1089.

Wang, M., Ko, I. Y., & Choi, J. (2009). The importance of morphological awareness in Korean–English biliteracy acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 132-142.

Webster, J., Franklin, S., & Howard, D. (2007). An analysis of thematic and phrasal structure in people with aphasia: What more can we learn from the story of Cinderella?. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(5), 363-394.



How to Cite

Vressick-Chilborn, S., & Rachman, M. O. (2020). Syntactic structure, morphology, free morphemes and bound morphemes. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 1(2), 85–92. Retrieved from