Phonology, phonetic and phonological aspects

Hassan Alsharif

doi:10.21744/mami.v1n1.5

Authors

Hassan Alsharif
hassan.alsharif@taibahu.edu.sa
Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia

Keywords:

argumentative discourse, discourse, language sounds, linguistic studies, normal sound, phonology, syllables, universal language

Abstract

This paper aimed at explaining the definition of phonology and exploring phonetic aspects in English. A continuous sequence of language sounds, sometimes an up and down sound, sometimes a short pause or a long pause, sometimes a loud or soft sound, and sometimes a stretching sound and a normal sound. The classification of this word in linguistics has always been a topic that has never been overlooked, since Aristotle's time until now, including in Indonesian linguistic studies, the problem has never been resolved. This occurs, because, firstly, each language has its own characteristics, and secondly, because the criteria used to classify the word can vary.

References

Atterer, M., & Ladd, D. R. (2004). On the phonetics and phonology of “segmental anchoring” of F0: evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00039-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00039-1

Barlaz, M., Shosted, R., Fu, M., & Sutton, B. (2018). Oropharygneal articulation of phonemic and phonetic nasalization in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.009

Baumann, S., & Cangemi, F. (2020). Integrating phonetics and phonology in the study of linguistic prominence. Journal of Phonetics, 81, 100993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100993

Beckman, J., Helgason, P., McMurray, B., & Ringen, C. (2011). Rate effects on Swedish VOT: Evidence for phonological overspecification. Journal of phonetics, 39(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.11.001

Berent, I. (2013). The phonological mind. Trends in cognitive sciences, 17(7), 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.004

Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of phonetics, 20(3), 305-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30637-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30637-0

Bohn, O. S., & Best, C. T. (2012). Native-language phonetic and phonological influences on perception of American English approximants by Danish and German listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.002

Bondarko, L. V. (2005). Phonetic and phonological aspects of the opposition of ‘soft’and ‘hard’consonants in the modern Russian language. Speech communication, 47(1-2), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.03.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.03.012

Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1990). Representation and reality: Physical systems and phonological structure. Journal of Phonetics, 18(3), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30382-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30382-1

Burgess, J., & Spencer, S. (2000). Phonology and pronunciation in integrated language teaching and teacher education. System, 28(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00007-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00007-5

Bürki, A., Fougeron, C., Gendrot, C., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2011). Phonetic reduction versus phonological deletion of French schwa: Some methodological issues. Journal of Phonetics, 39(3), 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.07.003

Chen, Y. (2011). How does phonology guide phonetics in segment–f0 interaction?. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 612-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.04.001

Darcy, I., Park, H., & Yang, C. L. (2015). Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.005

Davidson, L. (2006). Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 34(1), 104-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.03.004

de Leeuw, E., & Celata, C. (2019). Plasticity of native phonetic and phonological domains in the context of bilingualism. Journal of Phonetics, 75, 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.05.003

Deng, L. (1998). A dynamic, feature-based approach to the interface between phonology and phonetics for speech modeling and recognition. Speech communication, 24(4), 299-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00023-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00023-5

Dinnsen, D. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1984). Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation and individual differences. Journal of phonetics, 12(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30850-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30850-2

Dmitrieva, O., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2010). Phonological neutralization by native and non-native speakers: The case of Russian final devoicing. Journal of phonetics, 38(3), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.06.001

Dmitrieva, O., Llanos, F., Shultz, A. A., & Francis, A. L. (2015). Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.12.005

Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of phonetics, 34(4), 409-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002

Frisch, S. A., & Wright, R. (2002). The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue. Journal of Phonetics, 30(2), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2002.0176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2002.0176

Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of memory and language, 66(4), 789-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006

Hallé, P. A., Best, C. T., & Levitt, A. (1999). Phonetic vs. phonological influences on French listeners' perception of American English approximants. Journal of phonetics, 27(3), 281-306. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0097

Johnson, K. (2006). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of phonetics, 34(4), 485-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.004

Kharlamov, V. (2014). Incomplete neutralization of the voicing contrast in word-final obstruents in Russian: Phonological, lexical, and methodological influences. Journal of phonetics, 43, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.02.002

Klatt, D. H. (1979). Speech perception: A model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of phonetics, 7(3), 279-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31059-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31059-9

Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2010). Distinctive features: Phonological underspecification in representation and processing. Journal of Phonetics, 38(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.01.002

Local, J. (2003). Variable domains and variable relevance: interpreting phonetic exponents. Journal of Phonetics, 31(3-4), 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00045-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00045-7

Menn, L. (1983). Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities. Language production, 2, 3-50.

Mennen, I. (2004). Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of phonetics, 32(4), 543-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002

Mitterer, H., & Ernestus, M. (2008). The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task. Cognition, 109(1), 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.002

Nielsen, K. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007

Ohala, J. J. (1990). There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: a personal view. Journal of phonetics, 18(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30399-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30399-7

Ohala, J. J., & Ohala, M. (1993). The phonetics of nasal phonology: Theorems and data. In Nasals, nasalization, and the velum (pp. 225-249). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-360380-7.50013-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-360380-7.50013-2

Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Blachman, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., ... & Gore, J. C. (2004). Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically-based intervention. Biological psychiatry, 55(9), 926-933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.12.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.12.019

Sproat, R., & Fujimura, O. (1993). Allophonic variation in English/l/and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of phonetics, 21(3), 291-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31340-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31340-3

Turkeltaub, P. E., & Coslett, H. B. (2010). Localization of sublexical speech perception components. Brain and language, 114(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.008

Van Oostendorp, M. (2008). Incomplete devoicing in formal phonology. Lingua, 118(9), 1362-1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.009

Warner, N., Jongman, A., Sereno, J., & Kemps, R. (2004). Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of phonetics, 32(2), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00032-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00032-9

Wiese, R. (2006). Phonology: overview. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 9, 562-564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00035-3